Worse than radar charts? Mosaic displays!
Data on hair and eye color of 592 students is transformed into this:
The relative frequency is displayed as an area. However, the eye isn’t good in comparing areas of different sizes.
All three areas are of the same size: 
The labels are hard to read, too. You have to count. To display the frequency a simple graphic table is enough:
For the time being, the best data graphics come from the American elite papers. The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post provide clean graphs, free of chart junk and information dense.
Welt am Sonntag is close. Only the alternating background colors are nonsense. They change contrast and message. What is the message? Is it nicer in the light areas? What do I do wrong when I enter the dark areas?
Nonetheless: Thank you WAMS! The others make me cry anyway.
You are currently browsing the Bella consults weblog archives for May, 2007.
